Menu Top
Latest History NCERT Notes, Solutions and Extra Q & A (Class 8th to 12th)
8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

Class 11th Chapters
1. Writing And City Life 2. An Empire Across Three Continents 3. Nomadic Empires
4. The Three Orders 5. Changing Cultural Traditions 6. Displacing Indigenous Peoples
7. Paths To Modernisation



Theme 5 Changing Cultural Traditions



Between the fourteenth and late seventeenth centuries, Europe witnessed significant changes in its cultural traditions, largely centered in its growing towns. This period is often referred to as the **Renaissance**, meaning "rebirth," a term used by later historians, particularly emphasized by the Swiss scholar **Jacob Burckhardt** in his book *The Civilisation of the Renaissance in Italy* (1860).


During this time, a distinct **‘urban culture’** emerged. Townspeople developed a sense of being more ‘civilised’ compared to rural populations. Cities, especially in Italy like Florence, Venice, and Rome, became vibrant hubs of art and learning.


Wealthy individuals and the aristocracy actively supported artists and writers, fostering creativity. The invention of **printing** revolutionized the availability of books and other written materials, spreading ideas and information more widely and rapidly to people in various towns and countries.


A new **sense of history** also developed. People of this era saw themselves as living in a ‘modern’ world that was distinct from and, in their view, superior to the ‘ancient’ world of the Greeks and Romans, which they sought to revive.


Religion began to be viewed increasingly as a matter of **individual choice**. Scientific discoveries challenged established beliefs; the geocentric view (Earth-centered universe) promoted by the Church was overturned by new understandings of the solar system. New geographical knowledge, gained through voyages of exploration, also displaced the Eurocentric view that the Mediterranean Sea was the focal point of the world.


Historians studying this period benefit from a wealth of available materials, including documents, printed books, artworks (paintings, sculptures), architectural remains, and textiles, many of which are preserved in archives, galleries, and museums. Historians like Jacob Burckhardt moved beyond the traditional focus solely on political history (as advocated by his teacher Leopold von Ranke) to emphasize the importance of culture in understanding historical change. Burckhardt highlighted how a new **‘humanist’ culture**, characterized by a belief in the individual's capabilities and potential, flourished in Italian towns during this era, contrasting it with what he termed the Church-controlled thinking of the 'medieval' period.


The Revival Of Italian Cities

After the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the fifth century, many Italian towns that had served as political and cultural centers declined. Italy became fragmented politically, lacking a unified government. While feudal systems reshaped western Europe and centralized empires developed in the east (Byzantine) and further west (Islamic caliphates), Italy remained weak and divided into smaller states. However, these regional developments indirectly contributed to the **revival of Italian cities**.


With the expansion of trade between the Byzantine Empire and Islamic countries, coastal ports in Italy began to revive. From the twelfth century, Italian towns played a central role as trade increased along the Silk Route (opened up by the Mongols connecting with China) and with countries in western Europe. These Italian towns did not develop as part of a larger empire but as **independent city-states**. Notable examples included Florence and Venice, which were republics, while many other cities were ruled by princes (court-cities).


Cities like Venice and Genoa were distinct from much of the rest of Europe. The clergy did not hold dominant political power, nor were there powerful feudal lords controlling the countryside from castles within the city. Instead, wealthy **merchants and bankers** played an active role in the governance of these city-states, fostering a stronger sense of **citizenship** among the townspeople. Even when these cities were ruled by military leaders (despots), the pride felt by citizens in their urban identity remained strong.


The City-State

Cardinal Gasparo Contarini (1483-1542) described the system of government in Venice in his work *The Commonwealth and Government of Venice* (1534). He highlighted that the ultimate authority in Venice lay with a grand council composed of all gentlemen of the city who were over 25 years old. Contarini explained that their ancestors wisely chose not to allow common people to be part of this governing council to avoid political instability and unrest often seen in cities ruled by the populace. He also noted that while some argued for selecting rulers based on wealth, the Venetian system prioritized **nobility of lineage** or those ennobled by virtue, ensuring that the rule was not limited to just a few extremely wealthy individuals but included all those of noble birth or recognized virtue, thereby maintaining a form of commonwealth based on the participation of the nobility.


Universities And Humanism

Italian towns were also pioneers in the development of European universities. The earliest universities in Europe were established in Italian cities like Padua and Bologna, which became centers of legal studies from the eleventh century. The flourishing commerce in these cities created a growing demand for individuals skilled in law (lawyers and notaries) to draft and interpret contracts and agreements essential for large-scale trade. While law was a popular subject, a significant shift in educational focus began to emerge.


**Francesco Petrarch** (1304-1378) was a key figure in this transformation. Petrarch developed an interest in the literature of ancient Greece and Rome. He viewed antiquity as a distinct civilization that could be best understood by reading the original texts of classical authors. He advocated for a close study of these ancient works.


This educational approach suggested that important knowledge and skills could be gained from classical literature that traditional religious teaching alone did not provide. This new culture of learning based on classical texts and emphasizing human achievements was later labeled **‘humanism’** by historians in the nineteenth century. By the early fifteenth century, the term ‘humanist’ was used to describe scholars who taught subjects like grammar, rhetoric, poetry, history, and moral philosophy. These subjects, collectively known as the **‘humanities’** (derived from the Latin word *humanitas*, meaning culture), were distinct from traditional religious subjects and focused on developing individual skills through study, discussion, and debate. Humanists believed that debate and intellectual wrestling strengthened the mind (as argued by Giovanni Pico della Mirandola).


These new, revolutionary ideas gained traction in other universities, including the newly founded university in Petrarch’s hometown of Florence. Although Florence had not initially been a major center of trade or learning, it transformed dramatically in the fifteenth century, becoming a vibrant intellectual and artistic hub. Florence's reputation grew through its prominent citizens, including the poet **Dante Alighieri** (1265-1321), who wrote on religious themes in the vernacular, and the artist **Giotto** (1267-1337), known for painting lifelike portraits, marking a departure from earlier, more stylized artistic representations. Florence became known as the most intellectually exciting city in Italy and a center of artistic creativity. The ideal of the **‘Renaissance Man’** emerged during this time, describing individuals with wide-ranging interests and skills, as many prominent figures were accomplished in multiple fields (e.g., scholar, diplomat, theologian, artist).

Sketch or painting of the city of Florence as it appeared in 1470.
Painting by Giotto depicting the child Jesus, located in Assisi, Italy.

The Humanist View Of History

Humanists of the Renaissance era believed that they were ushering in a return to **‘true civilisation’** after what they perceived as centuries of darkness. They viewed the period following the collapse of the Roman Empire as a **‘dark age’** where classical learning had been suppressed. Following this perspective, later scholars in the nineteenth century often adopted a sharp historical division, labeling the millennium after the fall of Rome (roughly 5th to 14th centuries) as the **‘Middle Ages’** or **‘medieval period’**, and contrasting it with the **‘modern’** age beginning from the fifteenth century.


Humanists argued that during the Middle Ages, the Church's dominance over intellectual life had overshadowed and effectively wiped out the achievements of Greek and Roman learning. However, more recent historical research has challenged this stark periodization. With greater understanding of European history during the so-called ‘Dark Ages’ and ‘Middle Ages’, scholars are less inclined to make such sharp divisions and view the entire post-Roman period as lacking cultural vibrancy. Labeling any period as the 'Dark Ages' is increasingly considered unfair, as significant developments in art, architecture, literature, and intellectual life did occur during the medieval period.


Nonetheless, the humanist perspective significantly influenced subsequent historical narratives by establishing a framework that emphasized the revival of classical antiquity as a defining feature of the Renaissance and the perceived transition from a 'medieval' to a 'modern' era.


Science And Philosophy: The Arabs’ Contribution

While some knowledge of Greek and Roman writings was preserved by monks and clergy during the medieval period, it was often limited in scope and not widely disseminated. In the fourteenth century, European scholars gained renewed access to a broader range of classical texts, largely thanks to the significant contributions of **Arab translators** and scholars.


Arab scholars in the Islamic world had carefully preserved and translated numerous ancient Greek manuscripts into Arabic, including works by philosophers like Plato (known as Aflatun in Arabic) and Aristotle (known as Aristu in Arabic). This provided a crucial bridge for the transmission of classical knowledge. European scholars in the fourteenth century began to read these Greek works in Arabic translation. Furthermore, Muslim scholars also produced original works in natural science, mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and chemistry. Greek scholars also translated works of Arabic and Persian scholars, facilitating their spread to other parts of Europe.


Prominent Muslim scholars whose works were highly regarded in Italian intellectual circles and translated into Latin included **Ibn Sina** (Avicenna, 980-1037), an Arab physician and philosopher from Central Asia, and **al-Razi** (Rhazes), known for his medical encyclopaedia. **Ibn Rushd** (Averroes, 1126-1198), an Arab philosopher from Spain, attempted to reconcile philosophical knowledge with religious beliefs, and his methods influenced Christian thinkers. This flow of knowledge from the Islamic world, based on both preserved classical texts and original scholarship, significantly enriched European learning during the Renaissance.


Humanist ideas began to extend beyond specialized scholarly circles. While traditional university curricula remained focused on law, medicine, and theology, humanist subjects like grammar, rhetoric, and history were gradually introduced into schools in Italy and later across other European countries, broadening the scope of education.


Artists And Realism

Humanist ideas were effectively communicated not just through formal education but also through art, architecture, and the increasing availability of books. Renaissance artists were deeply influenced by humanism's emphasis on individual potential and a renewed interest in the physical world, leading to a focus on **realism** in art.


Artists were inspired by studying the material remains of classical Roman culture, seeking out fragments of ancient art in ruins. They admired the realistic and 'perfectly' proportioned figures in ancient Roman sculptures, which inspired Italian sculptors like **Donatello** (1386-1466) to create more lifelike statues, breaking away from medieval styles. The desire for accuracy in art was also aided by advancements in science, particularly in the study of the human body. Artists visited medical schools to study bone structures and anatomy, enhancing the realism of their depictions of the human form. Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564), a Belgian professor in Padua, pioneered the dissection of the human body, contributing to the development of modern physiology and providing crucial anatomical knowledge for artists.


Brush drawing by Albrecht Durer titled 'Praying Hands', created in 1508.
Sculpture by Michelangelo titled 'The Pieta', depicting Mary holding the body of Jesus.

Painters, lacking older models like sculptors had in Roman statues, also strived for realism. They applied knowledge of geometry to understand **perspective**, creating a sense of depth and three-dimensionality in their pictures. Observing the changing quality of light and shadow also enhanced the realism of their work. The adoption of **oil paints** as a medium provided richer colors and allowed for finer detail. Interestingly, the colors and designs in some paintings of this period show the influence of Chinese and Persian art, which became accessible through increased contact facilitated by the Mongol Empire.


Figures like **Leonardo da Vinci** (1452-1519) embodied the Renaissance ideal of a multi-talented individual. He had wide interests spanning science and art, conducting studies in botany, anatomy, and mathematics alongside his painting (Mona Lisa, The Last Supper). His fascination with flight led him to study birds and design flying machines, signing his name as "disciple of experiment."


The combination of scientific knowledge (anatomy, geometry, physics) and a strong artistic sensibility led to a new quality in Italian art – **‘realism’** – which became a defining characteristic of the Renaissance and continued to influence art for centuries.


ACTIVITY 2. Describe the different scientific elements in the work of sixteenth-century Italian artists.

Answer:

Sixteenth-century Italian artists, influenced by the broader intellectual currents of the Renaissance and humanism, increasingly incorporated scientific elements into their work to achieve greater realism and depth. Different scientific elements were evident in various aspects of their art:

  • Anatomy: Artists like Leonardo da Vinci and others studied human anatomy through dissection and detailed drawings. This scientific understanding allowed them to depict the human body more accurately, showing correct bone structures, musculature, and proportions, which added significantly to the lifelike quality of their sculptures and paintings.
  • Geometry and Perspective: Artists applied principles of geometry to master perspective. Understanding mathematical perspective allowed them to create the illusion of three-dimensional space on a two-dimensional surface, making buildings, landscapes, and figures appear realistic and correctly proportioned relative to their position in the picture plane.
  • Physics and Optics: Artists paid close attention to the behavior of light. By observing and depicting the changing quality of light and shadow, they could render forms with volume and create a sense of depth and realism. This involved an empirical understanding of how light interacts with objects, a precursor to later studies in optics.
  • Botany (in some cases): Artists like Leonardo da Vinci conducted studies of plants, which informed the accurate representation of vegetation in their paintings.

Thus, Renaissance art was not just about aesthetics; it was deeply intertwined with scientific inquiry and observation, reflecting a new approach to understanding and representing the natural world.


Architecture

The city of **Rome** experienced a remarkable revival in the fifteenth century, becoming a major center of Renaissance activity. From 1417, the political authority of the Popes in Rome was strengthened, ending a period of division within the Church. The Popes actively supported the study of Rome's history and commissioned the careful excavation of ancient Roman ruins by archaeologists, a newly developing skill. These discoveries and the study of classical Roman buildings inspired a "new" architectural style that was, in fact, a revival of the imperial Roman (now called **‘classical’**) style.


**Architects familiar with classical forms** were employed by Popes, wealthy merchants, and aristocrats to design new buildings. Artists and sculptors were commissioned to decorate these structures with paintings, sculptures, and reliefs, creating a synthesis of architecture and other art forms. Figures like Leon Batista Alberti wrote influential treatises on architectural theory, emphasizing beauty and function based on classical principles. (Figure 6.20 shows Brunelleschi's Duomo).

Photograph of the Duomo (dome) of the Florence Cathedral, designed by Filippo Brunelleschi, a masterpiece of Renaissance architecture inspired by classical forms.

Some individuals excelled in multiple artistic disciplines. **Michelangelo Buonarroti** (1475-1564) is a prime example, renowned equally as a painter (Sistine Chapel ceiling), sculptor ('The Pieta'), and architect (design of the dome of St Peter's Church in Rome). Filippo Brunelleschi (1337-1446), the architect of the spectacular Duomo of Florence, also began his career as a sculptor.


A significant change in the status of artists occurred during this period: artists began to be recognized and known **individually by name**, rather than primarily as members of a workshop or guild, as had been the case earlier. Their individual genius and achievements were celebrated, reflecting the broader humanist emphasis on individual talent and accomplishment.


Italian architecture in the sixteenth century consciously emulated many features of imperial Roman buildings, such as columns, domes, arches, and classical proportions, aiming to recapture the grandeur and beauty of antiquity.


The First Printed Books

For people outside Italy to appreciate Italian paintings, sculptures, or buildings, travel was necessary. However, the written word could travel much more easily, thanks to a revolutionary technological advancement: the **mastery of printing technology**. This development, a key revolution of the sixteenth century, fundamentally changed the dissemination of knowledge and ideas across Europe.


Europeans were indebted to other civilizations for the core printing technology. Printing techniques had been developed earlier in China. European traders and diplomats became familiar with printing during visits to Chinese courts, often facilitated by the wide reach of the Mongol Empire. (Other important innovations like firearms, the compass, and the abacus also reached Europe from Asia during this period).


Before printing, texts existed only as hand-written copies, which were expensive and time-consuming to produce, severely limiting their availability. The invention of the first printing press by **Johannes Gutenberg** (1400-1458) in Germany revolutionized book production. In 1455, Gutenberg's workshop printed 150 copies of the Bible – a quantity that would have taken a single monk many years to copy by hand. By 1500, numerous classical texts, mostly in Latin, had been printed in Italy.


The availability of **printed books** made them more affordable and accessible. Students no longer had to rely solely on lecture notes or expensive manuscript copies. Ideas, opinions, and information could circulate much more widely and rapidly. A printed book containing new ideas could quickly reach hundreds of readers. This accessibility also encouraged the development of a **reading habit** among people, as individuals could now afford to buy copies of books for themselves.


The spread of humanist culture from Italy across the Alps from the late fifteenth century was greatly accelerated by the circulation of printed books. This explains why earlier intellectual movements had tended to remain confined to specific regions due to the difficulty of sharing texts. Printing was a transformative technology that democratized access to knowledge and significantly contributed to the intellectual and cultural ferment of the Renaissance and the subsequent Age of Exploration and scientific revolution.


A New Concept Of Human Beings

A defining characteristic of humanist culture was a relative weakening of the absolute control of religion over all aspects of human life, leading to a more secular outlook in certain spheres. While Italians were deeply engaged with the material world, pursuing wealth, power, and glory, this did not necessarily mean they were irreligious. However, there was a growing focus on earthly life and human potential.


Humanists like Francesco Barbaro defended the pursuit and acquisition of wealth as a virtue. Lorenzo Valla, in his work *On Pleasure*, questioned the traditional Christian condemnation of pleasure, suggesting that the study of history inspires a striving for a life of perfection. There was also an increased emphasis on **good manners**, polite speech, correct dress, and the skills expected of a cultured person.


Humanism promoted the idea that individuals were capable of shaping their own lives and achieving great things through their own efforts, intelligence, and skills, independent of predetermined roles or divine intervention. This belief in individual agency and potential stood in contrast to the rigid social structure of feudal society, which divided people into fixed ‘three orders’. The humanist ideal saw human nature as multi-faceted, capable of various pursuits beyond just the functions of clergy, nobility, or peasantry. Thinkers like Niccolo Machiavelli, while perhaps pessimistic about human nature (seeing men as inherently bad and self-interested), still analyzed human motivations and actions from a pragmatic perspective, focusing on real-world political behavior rather than purely theological interpretations.


The Aspirations Of Women

While the Renaissance promoted new ideals of individuality and citizenship, these ideals largely **excluded women**. Public life and decision-making roles within families were dominated by men from aristocratic families. Sons were typically educated and prepared to take their place in family businesses or public roles, while younger sons might join the Church. Although women from wealthy families brought dowries that were invested in family businesses, they generally had little influence on how these businesses were managed by their husbands. Marriages were often arranged to strengthen business alliances between families. If a suitable dowry could not be provided, daughters might be sent to convents to become nuns. Consequently, women's public roles were generally limited, and they were primarily seen as responsible for managing the household.


However, the position of women in **merchant families** differed somewhat. Wives often assisted their husbands in running shops, and in families of wealthy merchants and bankers, wives might manage the business affairs when their husbands were away travelling. The early death of a merchant could also compel his widow to take on a more significant public role in managing the family business than might have been the case in aristocratic families.


Despite societal limitations, a few women were intellectually creative and recognized the value of humanist education. Figures like the Venetian **Cassandra Fedele** (1465-1558) advocated for women's education, arguing that even though it offered no direct rewards in terms of public office or wealth, every woman should pursue such studies. Fedele was a respected scholar known for her knowledge of Greek and Latin, invited to give public speeches, challenging the notion that women were incapable of humanist scholarship. Her writings, along with those of other Venetian women writers, criticized the limitations placed on women's freedom and opportunities in the republic. Another notable woman was **Isabella d’Este** (1474-1539), the Marchesa of Mantua, who effectively ruled her state when her husband was absent and created a renowned court known for its intellectual and artistic brilliance. The writings of these women reveal a desire for economic power, property rights, and education as means to establish their identity and influence in a male-dominated world.


Authors like Balthasar Castiglione, in his book *The Courtier*, offered prescriptions for ideal behavior and accomplishments, including for women. While acknowledging that women should cultivate virtues of the mind similar to men, his description of ideal feminine conduct emphasized "soft and delicate tenderness" and "feminine sweetness," suggesting traditional expectations for how women should present themselves, even while acquiring fine accomplishments.


Balthasar Castiglione, The Courtier (Box). ‘I hold that a woman should in no way resemble a man as regards her ways, manners, words, gestures and bearing. Thus just as it is very fitting that a man should display a certain robust and sturdy manliness, so it is well for a woman to have a certain soft and delicate tenderness, with an air of feminine sweetness in her every movement, which, in her going and staying and whatsoever she does, always makes her appear a woman, without any resemblance to a man. If this precept be added to the rules that these gentlemen have taught the courtier, then I think that she ought to be able to make use of many of them, and adorn herself with the finest accomplishments... For I consider that many virtues of the mind are as necessary to a woman as to a man; as it is to be of good family; to shun affectation: to be naturally graceful; to be well mannered, clever and prudent; to be neither proud, envious or evil-tongued, nor vain... to perform well and gracefully the sports suitable for women.’

Answer:

Castiglione's description of the ideal woman in *The Courtier* reveals a blend of progressive and traditional views regarding women's roles and qualities in the Renaissance courtly ideal. He believes that women should cultivate "many virtues of the mind" which are as necessary for them as for men, listing qualities like being well-mannered, clever, prudent, avoiding negative traits (proud, envious, evil-tongued, vain), and being graceful and accomplished. This part acknowledges the intellectual and moral capabilities of women, aligning somewhat with humanist ideas about the importance of education and virtue for all individuals.

However, Castiglione also emphasizes that a woman "should in no way resemble a man" in her external presentation. He stresses the importance of displaying a "soft and delicate tenderness" and "feminine sweetness" in all movements and behaviors, contrasting with the "robust and sturdy manliness" suitable for men. This aspect reinforces traditional gender roles and expectations regarding demeanor and appearance, suggesting that even as women acquired accomplishments, they were still expected to conform to conventional notions of femininity.

When considering who they had in mind, both Fedele and Castiglione likely focused primarily on **women of the educated, aristocratic, or wealthy merchant classes**. Fedele's orations at the University of Padua and her interactions with scholars indicate her context was intellectual elites. Castiglione's book is specifically about the ideal 'courtier' (someone who attends court), which pertains to the nobility and those aspiring to move in aristocratic circles. While their ideas on women's capabilities and roles differed, their discussions were situated within the social milieu of the upper classes who had the leisure and resources for education and participation in courtly or intellectual life.


Portrait painting of Isabella d’Este, Marchesa of Mantua.

Debates Within Christianity

Increased trade, travel, and diplomatic contacts linked Italian towns and courts with the rest of Europe and beyond, facilitating the spread of the new humanist culture. While admired and imitated by the educated and wealthy elites, these new ideas had less direct impact on the majority of ordinary people, who were often illiterate.


In universities across northern Europe during the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, scholars were increasingly drawn to humanist ideas. Like their Italian counterparts, they studied classical Greek and Roman texts, but they also focused on the **holy books of Christianity** using humanist methods (studying original texts critically). Unlike Italy, where professional secular scholars dominated humanism, in northern Europe, many members of the Church were attracted to humanism. These **Christian humanists** advocated for a return to the original practices and teachings of Christianity as found in ancient religious texts, criticizing unnecessary rituals and traditions that they viewed as later corruptions of a simpler religion.


Figures like **Thomas More** (1478-1535) in England and **Erasmus** (1466-1536) in Holland were prominent Christian humanists who criticized the corruption they saw within the Catholic Church, particularly practices like the clergy's greed and the selling of **‘indulgences’** (documents promising forgiveness from sins, which were effectively purchased). The increasing availability of the Bible translated into local languages, made possible by printing, allowed more people to read and interpret religious texts for themselves. Many Christians realized that practices like selling indulgences were not supported by their religion's core texts.


This growing dissatisfaction with the Church's practices and teachings contributed to widespread discontent. Peasants rebelled against Church taxes, and princes were irritated by the Church's interference in state affairs. Humanists also questioned the basis of the Church's claims to temporal power, notably the document known as the **‘Donation of Constantine’**. Humanist scholars used their linguistic and historical skills to demonstrate that this document, which supposedly granted secular authority to the Pope, was a later **forgery** and not genuinely issued by Emperor Constantine.


In **1517**, a German monk named **Martin Luther** (1483-1546) initiated a major challenge to the Catholic Church. He argued that salvation was achieved through faith alone and that individuals could have a direct relationship with God without the need for priests as intermediaries. This movement, known as the **Protestant Reformation**, led to the separation of many churches in Germany and Switzerland from the authority of the Pope. Reformers like Ulrich Zwingli and Jean Calvin further popularized these ideas. Backed by merchants, the reformers gained significant support in towns, although the Catholic Church retained more influence in rural areas.


More radical reformers, like the Anabaptists, blended religious ideas of equality with social demands, arguing that God created all people as equal, implying they should not have to pay taxes or be subject to social oppression, and should have the right to choose their own priests. These ideas appealed to peasants struggling under feudalism. However, Luther did not support these radical social demands and called for the suppression of peasant rebellions.


The Reformation led to periods of religious conflict across Europe. In France, Protestants (Huguenots) were persecuted but eventually gained the right to worship as they chose. In England, King Henry VIII broke with the Pope and established the Anglican Church with the monarch as its head. The Catholic Church also underwent internal reform (the Counter-Reformation), emphasizing simplicity and service to the poor. In Spain, Ignatius Loyola founded the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) in 1540 to combat Protestantism, focusing on education, missionary work, and service.


William Tyndale (Box). William Tyndale (1494-1536), an English Lutheran who translated the Bible into English in 1506, defended Protestantism thus:
‘In this they be all agreed, to drive you from the knowledge of the scripture, and that ye shall not have the text thereof in the mother-tongue, and to keep the world still in darkness, to the intent they might sit in the consciences of the people, through vain superstition and false doctrine, to satisfy their proud ambition, and insatiable covetousness, and to exalt their own honour above king and emperor, yea, and above God himself... Which thing only moved me to translate the New Testament. Because I had perceived by experience, how that it was impossible to establish the lay-people in any truth, except the scripture were plainly laid before their eyes in their mother-tongue, that they might see the process, order, and meaning of the text. ‘

Answer:

William Tyndale's statement reveals several key criticisms by Protestants against the Catholic Church of his time, particularly regarding access to scripture and the clergy's power:

  • Preventing Access to Scripture: Tyndale argues that the Church hierarchy ("they") deliberately kept the lay people ("you") from having access to the Bible in their own language ("mother-tongue"). He believed this was done to maintain control over people's consciences.
  • Promoting Ignorance and False Doctrine: He claims the Church intended "to keep the world still in darkness" by preventing access to the scriptures, enabling them to rule through "vain superstition and false doctrine."
  • Greed and Ambition: Tyndale accuses the clergy of using their control over religious knowledge to satisfy their "proud ambition, and insatiable covetousness," putting their own honor and power above even kings, emperors, and God Himself.
  • Maintaining Power through Mediation: By preventing lay people from reading the Bible directly, the clergy positioned themselves as necessary intermediaries between God and the people, thus maintaining their power and influence over religious understanding and practice.

Tyndale's motivation for translating the New Testament into English was directly tied to these criticisms. He believed that providing the Bible in the vernacular was essential ("impossible to establish the lay-people in any truth, except the scripture were plainly laid before their eyes") so that ordinary people could read and understand the text's meaning for themselves, freeing them from reliance on the clergy's potentially self-serving interpretations.


ACTIVITY 4. What were the issues on which the Protestants criticised the Catholic Church?

Answer:

Based on the text, Protestants criticized the Catholic Church on several key issues:

  • Selling of Indulgences: They strongly condemned the practice of selling indulgences, viewing it as a corrupt way for the Church to extort money from ordinary people under the false premise of freeing buyers from the burden of their sins.
  • Clergy's Greed and Corruption: Protestants accused the clergy and the Church as an institution of being motivated by greed and ambition, seeking wealth and power over genuine spiritual guidance.
  • Interference in Secular/State Affairs: Princes and secular rulers resented the Church's claims to fiscal (taxation) and judicial powers and its interference in the administration of the state.
  • Lack of Access to Scripture in Vernacular: Protestants argued that the Church intentionally kept the Bible in Latin, preventing ordinary people from reading it in their own language. They believed this was done to maintain the clergy's control over religious interpretation and keep people ignorant.
  • Authority of the Pope and Necessity of Priests as Intermediaries: Reformers like Martin Luther challenged the Pope's ultimate authority and the Catholic teaching that priests were necessary intermediaries between individuals and God. They emphasized direct faith in God and the authority of scripture over Church traditions.
  • Unnecessary Rituals and Later Additions: Christian humanists criticized many rituals and traditions within the Church, viewing them as later additions and deviations from the simpler form of Christianity described in the ancient texts of the religion.

Key events of the 16th and 17th centuries include milestones of the Reformation, scientific advancements, and the development of calendar systems:


The Copernican Revolution

Parallel to the debates within Christianity, the traditional religious view of humanity and the universe was challenged by scientific discoveries. A turning point in European science was the work of **Nicolaus Copernicus** (1473-1543), a contemporary of Martin Luther. Traditional Christian cosmology, influenced by ancient Greek ideas (like Ptolemy), held a **geocentric** view, placing the Earth as a sinful and immobile center of the universe, around which celestial bodies revolved.


Copernicus, however, asserted a **heliocentric** theory, proposing that the **planets, including the Earth, revolve around the sun**. As a devout Christian, Copernicus was apprehensive about the potential negative reaction from traditional clergy to his theory. He reportedly delayed the printing of his major work, *De revolutionibus* (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres), which was only published near the end of his life and given to his follower Joachim Rheticus. Acceptance of this revolutionary idea was gradual.


Self-portrait painting of Nicolaus Copernicus.

Later astronomers built upon Copernicus's work. **Johannes Kepler** (1571-1630) showed that planets move around the sun not in perfect circles but in **elliptical orbits**. **Galileo Galilei** (1564-1642), through observation using the telescope, provided further evidence supporting the idea of a dynamic, sun-centered system. These advancements in astronomy fundamentally altered the understanding of the universe, bridging the perceived gap between a static, imperfect Earth and perfect, revolving celestial spheres.


This scientific revolution reached its culmination with **Isaac Newton’s** (1643-1727) publication of *Principia Mathematica* (1687), which described the law of **universal gravitation**, explaining the forces governing the motion of both terrestrial and celestial objects with a single set of principles, unifying physics on Earth and in the heavens.


Reading The Universe

Thinkers like Galileo argued that while the Bible provided spiritual guidance, it did not describe the workings of the physical universe. The work of Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo demonstrated that knowledge of the natural world could be gained through **observation and experiments**, distinct from religious belief. This emphasis on empirical investigation led to a rapid expansion of scientific inquiry in fields like physics, chemistry, and biology, marking the beginning of what historians call the **Scientific Revolution**.


Consequently, among some thinkers, particularly sceptics and non-believers, Nature began to replace God as the primary explanation for creation. Even among those who retained religious faith, there was a tendency to conceive of God as a more distant creator who established the laws of nature but did not directly intervene in the daily workings of the material world. These ideas were disseminated through newly established scientific societies, like the Royal Society in London (1662) and the Paris Academy (1670), which promoted the new scientific culture through public lectures and demonstrations.


Was There A European ‘Renaissance’ In The Fourteenth Century?

In conclusion, the concept of the ‘Renaissance’ as a sudden and sharp break with a preceding ‘Dark Age’ and a pure 'rebirth' of Greek and Roman antiquity has been questioned by recent historians. While the period from the fourteenth century onwards was undoubtedly a time of great cultural and intellectual ferment in Europe, some argue that **Jacob Burckhardt and other earlier scholars may have exaggerated the distinctiveness** of this era and the extent to which it simply revived classical traditions.


Arguments against a complete break include:


Therefore, viewing the Middle Ages as solely a period of gloom and lack of development in contrast to a purely dynamic Renaissance is considered an over-simplification by some. The cultural changes of this era were also influenced by factors beyond classical civilization.


Important changes that occurred in this period:


In summary, while the term Renaissance captures a period of significant cultural transformation marked by renewed interest in classical antiquity, it's also important to recognize the continuity with earlier periods, the influence of global interactions (especially from Asia), and the concurrent development of new concepts of individuality and national identity that reshaped European society.


Giovanni Boccaccio, Italian author (Box). ‘How many valiant men, how many fair ladies, (had) breakfast with their kinfolk and the same night supped with their ancestors in the next world! The condition of the people was pitiable to behold. They sickened by the thousands daily, and died unattended and without help. Many died in the open street, others dying in their houses, made it known by the stench of their rotting bodies. Consecrated churchyards did not suffice for the burial of the vast multitude of bodies, which were heaped by the hundreds in vast trenches, like goods in a ships hold and covered with a little earth.’

Answer:

Giovanni Boccaccio's vivid and harrowing account captures the scale and horror of the Black Death epidemic in the mid-fourteenth century. He emphasizes the suddenness and speed of death, illustrating how people could be healthy in the morning and dead by evening. The description highlights the immense suffering of the sick, many of whom died alone without care. The sheer number of deaths overwhelmed existing burial facilities ("consecrated churchyards did not suffice"), forcing the mass burial of bodies in large trenches, treated impersonally "like goods in a ship's hold." Boccaccio's writing underscores the profound social breakdown caused by the plague, where death was rampant, and traditional burial practices were overwhelmed, leaving a lasting impression of the catastrophe's impact on society.